Wednesday, December 26, 2007

Top Five Issues

In light of the upcoming primaries, I though it might be good to list my top political issues. There are so many issues out there from farm subsidies to abortion to free trade. But, if you're like me, then the majority of these issues are insignificant to you and your voting decisions. Each of us has a few issues that are the real issues we vote upon. So, I thought I would enumerate my top five issues here. I urge everyone who reads this to share your top five in a comment or on your own blog (in which case, please place a link in the comments).

  1. Iraq - I want us to get out of Iraq. I am in favor of withdrawal. It's the one issue on which Ron Paul and I see eye-to-eye. We are spending so much money on the war, money that could be spent on any number of important domestic programs. And, in a broader sense, I want elected officials who will not bring us into another preemptive war.
  2. Universal Health Care - I have believed in universal health care for as long as I have paid attention to politics. It's interesting that we are the only 1st world country which does not have universal health care, and yet we spend more per capita than any other country on health care. And our health as a nation sucks.
  3. Free Trade - Protectionism is the wrong answer. Free trade is the right one. Protectionism is the easy solution. But, as with most easy solutions, it will only work in the short run. It will bite us in the end.
  4. Science - The national science budget has been cut again. There couldn't be a worse thing to cut. If we want to maintain our position of dominance on the world stage, we cannot afford to abandon the actions that brought us here. A good investment in science also creates jobs, good intelligent jobs, the sort we need to promote (rather than protecting doomed jobs by fighting free trade). And, in a broader sense, I want elected officials who are knowledgeable about science. I'm tired of lawyers.
  5. Separation of Church and State - Lately the lines have been blurring between religion and government. The founding fathers established the separation of church and state for a reason. It benefits both parties. Unfortunately, there has been a lot of influence lately from the Christian Right aimed at the White House.

Sunday, December 23, 2007

The Right Way to Read a Blog

If you see JINXIDORU written in big block letters above this post and a blue bar above that, it means that you're probably not reading my blog in the way the 21st century intended you to read it. Here's the problem. If you're anything like me (for your sake, I hope the answer is no), you have a lot of friends with blogs. As each month passes more of your friends start creating blogs and encouraging you to read them. In fact, they probably ask you every time they see you whether you've read their most recent post about their childhood pet. But, you have no interest in checking for new blog posts every day to all fifty of your friends, especially when most of the blogs are like this one where the owner only posts once every other week. So, how is one to keep up to date on blogs without checking fifty sites every time you open your browser?

Well, fortunately, the internet gods have provided us a solution, and it is called RSS (Really Simple Syndication). The simplest explanation is that RSS provides a system wherein your computer periodically (usually once an hour) checks if a site has updated. If the site has updated since the last check, then the user is notified. Using RSS, one needs not constantly check if their are new posts. Your computer also keeps track of what posts you have read and which you have not. So, you can wait to read someone's posts until the perfect opportunity.

So, how do you use RSS? First you will need an aggregator. An aggregator is the program which takes individual RSS feeds and combines them (or aggregates) so the user can see which have updated and so on. There are many aggregators available, some for cost, most for free. With the number and quality of free aggregators, there is no reason to pay for one. In fact, Firefox and IE7 provide a mechanism for placing RSS feeds as bookmarks. When you expand the bookmark, it expands to the most recent 5 or 10 posts on the site.

While there are a lot of options, in my opinion the very best aggregator is Google Reader. Google Reader has a lot of great options and can be accessed from anywhere in the world. They even have an iPhone interface so that you can check people's blogs very easily from your iPhone. It's just plain a great product, and it's free.

So, let's setup a Google Reader account. Go to the Google Reader site and create an account. You can login directly if you have a gmail account or any Google account for that matter (blogger, analytics, personalized home page, etc...). Once you are in the program, you will see a dark blue link on the left with a big blue plus sign that reads "Add Subscription". Click that link, and you will be prompted for a feed URL. Go ahead and enter the address for a blog you read, for example "http://jinxidoru.blogspot.com". This will add the feed for the given blog to your feed list. If you now click the link at the top left that reads "All items", you will see a list of the most recent entries from the given blog. Click on any of these posts to read the post directly within Google Reader. Here is one of the great things about Google Reader, you can read the blogs without even going to the blog. Notice that once you've clicked on a post, it highlights to indicate that it has been read.

Google Reader has tons of great options. I'll give you a few, because I'm sure you can search out many others on your own. If you especially like a blog post or for some reason want to go back to it (say you didn't finish reading it), you can click the star next to a title. This will place the specific post in your Starred Items list. You can see all of the posts you've starred by clicking "Starred items" on the upper left.

Once you get a number of blogs, you can categorize them. This allows you to check specific types of blogs separately. The main reason I do this is because I use Google Reader to read the news. Most news sites provide RSS feeds. In fact, blogs were not the original intended purpose of RSS feeds, it was more for news sites. You can subscribe to CNN's news feed and you will see stories come across as they become available on CNN. But, as I'm sure you can imagine, CNN produces new stories much quicker than this blog, for example. And, while you probably want to read every single word that I write (and ponder it deeply, but ultimately accepting my opinions 100%), you probably won't read every CNN story. So the best thing to do is keep them separate. Create a tag for news and another tag for blogs. This way all of the new stories in your news feeds won't clutter your list of blog posts. This can be done by clicking "Settings", located at the very-top right of the screen then selected the "Subscriptions" tab on the following page. You can change the folders to which a blog belongs by selecting the correct folder in the drop-down list.

Alternatively to adding subscriptions through the "Add Subscription" link, you can add subscriptions with most modern browsers in an even easier way. If you visit a site with an RSS feed (like this one for example) there will be a little RSS icon on the address bar. It looks like the imagine posted to the left. Check in your address bar right now, there should be one if you are using Firefox. IE7 does something similar, I'm pretty sure. If you click it, there are a number of options which allow you to subscribe immediately.

One last option is for Google Reader users who also use Google's personalized home page. You can add a Google Reader widget your personalized home page. Then every time you start up your browser you will see who has updated their blog.

Well, I hope this has been helpful in some way. If anyone has any questions or needs help setting this up, let me know. I would be more than happy to assist. I really do encourage everyone to start using this. It has saved me a lot of time and helped me keep up-to-date much better with my friends' blogs.

Saturday, December 08, 2007

The Ten Commandments? Not in my court house.

Last night I had a discussion with a good friend about the Ten Commandments. More specifically, we discussed past issues of the commandments being displayed in public areas, such as court houses. This is an issue often brought up by believers to illustrate just how bad things have become in America. So, in the light of the Christmas season, I thought I might explain my reasons for siding with those who would take down the Ten Commandments.

I should note that I am not completely opposed to their display. The first amendment states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..." So, we see that the first amendment does not say that the government can't talk about or touch anything involving religion. It simply states that the government is not allowed to "establish" religion. Therefore, the question becomes whether or not displaying the Ten Commandments is an establishment of religion. Therein lies the crux of the matter.

There is a difference between presenting something for historical purposes and promoting something in a religious context. It comes down to intent, which is a difficult thing to show. But, then again, that's why we have the courts.

This same issue was broached in a court case against the Dover, Pennsylvania school board recently. They got in trouble because the they prepared a statement that biology teachers were to read before their classes that promoted Intelligent Design. The ensuing court case centered around the question of whether the school board was trying to promote religion or if it was presenting a legitimate scientific theory. The judge found that the school board was in fact trying to establish religion. In other words, the statement wasn't necessarily the problem. The problem was the intentions of the school board. They could reinstate the statement, as long as they could prove that it has nothing to do with the desire to promote religion.

The same is the case with the Ten Commandments. I have a number of atheist friends and associates. They are reasonable folk who have no problem with the commandments in an historical context. But when the commandments are placed as a sign of support by the given court house, that is when they have a problem.

Another defense given of the commandments is that they are the basis upon which our law system is built. I had believed this for years, until one day I read the Ten Commandments with that in mind. I realized how little the Decalogue has to do with our current system of laws. Let's examine each of the commandments.

1. Thou shalt have no other Gods before me
2. Thou shalt not make for thyself an idol
3. Thou shalt not make wrongful use of the name of thy God
4. Remember the Sabbath and keep it holy
The first four commandments all deal with things that fall within our most cherished of rights, the freedom of religion. There are few, even among the most devote that would want these first four commandments to be instated as laws.

5. Honor thy Father and Mother
Yes, we think this is a good idea, but once again, not law worthy. And, we most definitely do not agree with this in the strict sense to which it was adhered at the time the commandments were given.

6. Thou shalt not murder
7. Thou shalt not commit adultery
8. Thou shalt not steal
9. Thou shalt not bear false witness
Now that we have reached number six, we have finally arrived at the realm of laws we can actually agree upon as a nation. Six and eight are definitely within the realm of our law system. Seven and nine are a little fuzzier. Although adultery and lying are not illegal they can, in certain situations, result in legal repercussions. Even though these commandments do fit into our law system, the implication that we got them from here is silly. A cursory reading of the Old Testament shows that these four commandments were acknowledged long before Moses brought them down on tablets of stone.

10. Thou shalt not covet
Well, number ten is basically the cornerstone of our American capitalist system.

So, as you can see, our government is not based upon the Ten Commandments. In fact there are only two in the whole ten which are actually legitimate laws which we respect today. Of course, the natural response is then, "See how far we've fallen?!" But, it would take a truly fanatical person to believe that we should instate the above ten items as actual laws.

Let's think about this as objectively as we are able. Do we really think that people are putting up the Ten Commandments simply for their historical context? If so, why don't we see more copies of the Magna Carta and the Code of Hammurabi hanging in court houses? Those are two documents that have very strong, clear connections to our American justice system, as opposed to the Ten Commandments, which clearly do not. Let's be honest with ourselves. The majority of cases where the Ten Commandments are put on display, it is for the religious message that they present. It is a statement of support for Judeo-Christianity. And when such is the case, we are falling quite clearly within the realms of the establishment clause.